BlackwdAssessment of bronchial wall thickness in secondary childhood   and adults(12-19 years old) comparison with theoretical models

Jalilova O‘g‘iloy To‘lqin qizi; Sadikova Zumrad Shavkatovna

BlackwdAssessment of bronchial wall thickness in secondary childhood and adults(12-19 years old) comparison with theoretical models

Jalilova O‘g‘iloy To‘lqin qizi

master’s degree student in TMA

Sadikova Zumrad Shavkatovna

DSc professor

##semicolon## bronchial anatomy##common.commaListSeparator## human##common.commaListSeparator## image processing

सार

A thickened bronchial wall is the morphological substratum of most diseases of the airway. Theoretical and clinical models of bronchial morphometry have so far focused on bronchial lumen diameter, and bronchial length and angles, mainly assessed from bronchial casts. However, these models do not provide information on bronchial wall thickness. This paper reports in vivo values of cross-sectional wall area, lumen area, wall thickness and lumen diameter in ten healthy subjects as assessed by multi-detector computed tomography. A validated dedicated software package was used to measure these morphometric parameters up to the 14th bronchial generation, with respect to Weibel’s model of bronchial morphometry, and up to the 12th according to Boyden’s classification. Measured lumen diameters and homothety ratios were compared with theoretical values obtained from previously published studies, and no difference was found when considering dichotomic division of the bronchial tree. Mean wall area, lumen area, wall thickness and lumen diameter were then provided according to bronchial generation order, and mean homothety ratios were computed for wall area, lumen area and wall thickness as well as equations giving the mean value of each parameter for a given bronchial generation with respect to its value in generation 0 (trachea). Multi-detector computed tomography measurements of bronchial morphometric parameters may help to improve our knowledge of bronchial anatomy in vivo, our understanding of the pathophysiology of bronchial diseases and the evaluation of pharmacological effects on the bronchial wall.

##submission.citations##

Bates JH (1993) Stochastic model of the pulmonary airway tree and its implications for bronchial responsiveness. J Appl Physiol 75, 2493–2499.

Berger P, Perot V, Desbarats P, Tunon-de-Lara JM, Marthan R, Laurent F (2005) Airway wall thickness in cigarette smokers: quantitative thin-section CT assessment. Radiology 235, 1055– 1064.

Boser SR, Park H, Perry SF, Menache MG, Green FH (2005) Fractal geometry of airway remodeling in human asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172, 817–823.

Boyden EA (1955) Segmental Anatomy of the Lungs. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Brillet PY, Fetita CI, Beigelman-Aubry C, et al. (2007) Quantification of bronchial dimensions at MDCT using dedicated software. Eur Radiol 17, 1483–1489.

de Dietrich G, Braquelaire A (2004) A framework for tubular organs segmentation. In Winter School of Computer Graphics (posters) (ed. Press UAS), pp. 41–44. Czech Republic: Plzen. van Ertbruggen C, Hirsch C, Paiva M (2005) Anatomically based three-dimensional model of airways to simulate flow and particle transport using computational fluid dynamics. J Appl Physiol 98, 970–980.

Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Fanchamps JM, Dondelinger RF (2001) Congenital bronchial abnormalities revisited. Radiographics 21, 105–119.

Hooper G (1977) Diameters of bronchi at asymmetrical divisions. Respir Physiol 31, 291–294.

Horsfield K, Cumming G (1968) Morphology of the bronchial tree in man. J Appl Physiol 24, 373–383.

Horsfield K, Relea FG, Cumming G (1976) Diameter, length and branching ratios in the bronchial tree. Respir Physiol 26, 351– 356.

Horsfield K (1990) Diameters, generations, and orders of branches in the bronchial tree. J Appl Physiol 68, 457–461.

Mauroy B, Filoche M, Weibel ER, Sapoval B (2004) An optimal bronchial tree may be dangerous. Nature 427, 633–636.

Montaudon M, Berger P, Cangini-Sacher A, et al. (2007a) Bronchial measurement with three-dimensional quantitative thinsection CT in patients with cystic fibrosis. Radiology 242, 573–581.

Montaudon M, Berger P, de Dietrich G, et al. (2007b) Assessment of airways with three-dimensional quantitative thin-section CT:

in vitro and in vivo validation. Radiology 242, 563–572.

Murray CD (1926) The physiological principle of minimum work: I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 12, 207–214.

Nelson TR, Manchester DK (1988) Modeling of lung morphogenesis using fractal geometries. IEEE Trans Med Imag 7, 321–327.

Palagyi K, Tschirren J, Hoffman EA, Sonka M (2005) Quantitative analysis of pulmonary airway tree structures. Comput Biol Med 36, 974–976.

Phillips CG, Kaye SR (1995) Diameter-based analysis of the branching geometry of four mammalian bronchial trees. Respir Physiol 102, 303–316.

Sauret V, Halson PM, Brown IW, Fleming JS, Bailey AG (2002) Study of the three-dimensional geometry of the central conducting airways in man using computed tomographic (CT) images. J Anat 200, 123–134.

Tawhai MH, Hunter P, Tschirren J, Reinhardt J, McLennan G, Hoffman EA (2004) CT-based geometry analysis and finite element models of the human and ovine bronchial tree. J Appl Physiol 97, 2310–2321.