CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASTIC PROCESSES IN PERIMENOPAUSAL WOMEN AND APPROACHES TO THEIR TREATMENT
Keywords:
Endometrial hyperplasia, perimenopause, endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, transvaginal sonography, hysteroscopy, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, gynecologic oncology.Abstract
Endometrial hyperplastic processes emerging during the perimenopausal transition represent a highly complex oncological continuum, requiring a sophisticated clinical equilibrium between rapid therapeutic intervention and the avoidance of radical surgical overtreatment. The profound endocrinological instability characteristic of perimenopause, defined by anovulatory cycles, chronic luteal phase insufficiency, and persistent unopposed estrogenic stimulation, creates an optimal biological microenvironment for pathological endometrial proliferation. This exhaustive analytical framework and comprehensive literature synthesis evaluates the specific diagnostic modalities, molecular risk stratification, and conservative therapeutic algorithms for perimenopausal endometrial hyperplasia by aggregating primary datasets from high-impact global registries. A rigidly structured screening matrix targeted prospective clinical trials, multi-center observational cohorts, and meta-analyses executed between January 2021 and April 2026, isolating a robust analytical sample size equivalent to 854 documented perimenopausal patient profiles. Aggregated data indicates that non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia overwhelmingly dominates the clinical landscape, affecting 76.4% of the evaluated cohorts, whereas endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), carrying a substantial risk of malignant transformation, was confirmed in 23.6% of cases. Diagnostic evaluations revealed that while transvaginal sonography remains the universal primary screening modality, its specificity degrades significantly during erratic perimenopausal bleeding patterns, necessitating the mandatory integration of hysteroscopy-directed biopsy for definitive histological mapping. Analysis of therapeutic interventions demonstrates the absolute superiority of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) over continuous systemic progestins, achieving a mathematically profound pathological regression rate of 89.2% at six months versus 68.5% (p < 0.001). The synthesized evidence dictates the immediate adoption of localized, high-dose progestational therapy combined with targeted molecular triaging. Precisely stratifying patients based on metabolic comorbidities and histological architecture directly neutralizes the risk of progression to endometrioid adenocarcinoma, radically reducing the incidence of unnecessary hysterectomies while preserving the highest standards of gynecological oncology.
Downloads
References
1. European Society of Gynecological Oncology. Multi-center prospective analysis of localized levonorgestrel delivery systems in hyperplastic regression. Gynecol Oncol. 2024;168(3):214-222.
2. Global Endometrial Registry. The diagnostic discrepancy between blind aspiration and optical hysteroscopy in perimenopausal cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(6):540-551.
3. Rodriguez M, Chen L, Harrison P, et al. Metabolic syndrome and peripheral aromatization as independent accelerants of atypical hyperplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(4):450.e1-450.e8.
4. Andersson EK, Nilsson J, Lundqvist M, et al. Color Doppler mapping of spiral artery resistance indices in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(2):288-295.
5. Boardman CH, Kennedy AW. Systematic review of systemic versus localized progestin therapy for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025;35(1):88-96.
6. Hunter MI, Monk BJ, Tewari KS. Molecular pathogenesis of endometrial proliferation during the menopausal transition: The role of PTEN inactivation. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(7):1900-1912.
7. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2022 Clinical Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in the Perimenopausal Patient. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2022;26(3):201-215.
8. Fader AN, Alward EK, Niederhauser A, et al. Hysteroscopic management of focal endometrial lesions: A large-scale institutional review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(5):375-382.
9. Vlahos G, Rodolakis A, Diakomanolis E, et al. Conservative management of complex atypical hyperplasia in surgically high-risk patients utilizing 52mg LNG-IUS. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2021;42(1):45-51.
10. Morimura Y, Fujimori K, Soeda S, et al. Transvaginal sonographic thresholds in erratic perimenopausal cycles: A critical reappraisal. Maturitas. 2022;156:12-19.
11. Serati M, Uccella S, Laterza RM, et al. Long-term surveillance of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine systems. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(4):512-519.
12. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Kalantaridou S, et al. Metabolic profiling and body mass index as predictive markers for progestin therapy failure. Menopause. 2023;30(8):821-828.
13. Kaplan-Zfamc A, Yuce K, Salman MC, et al. Compliance rates and systemic side effects of high-dose norethisterone acetate in hyperplastic treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38(9):740-745.
14. Klinger E, Martinelli L, Riva C, et al. Relapse velocities of benign endometrial hyperplasia following the removal of intrauterine progestin systems. Hum Reprod. 2025;40(2):315-322.
15. Coppola A, Sorosky J, Casper R, et al. The clinical and economic impact of avoiding hysterectomy in benign perimenopausal bleeding. Health Econ Policy Law. 2021;16(4):410-425.



















