PDF
ZENODO
Published
2026-03-22
Section
Articles
How to Cite
How to Cite
UZBEKISTAN EMBROIDERY TERMINOLOGY
Umarova Shaxlo
O‘zbek tili kafedrasi tayanch doktoranti Samarqand davlat pedagogika instituti
Keywords: embroidery, terminology, Uzbek craftsmanship, regional schools, lexicography, goldwork, suzani, pattern types, standardization, intangible cultural heritage.
Abstract
This article examines the formation, regional characteristics, and scientific classification of Uzbek embroidery terminology. The research is structured according to the IMRAD methodology and covers introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Uzbek embroidery terminology constitutes a rich lexical layer combining indigenous, Persian, Arabic, and partially Russian loanwords.
During the study, the terminology of seven regional schools (Bukhara, Samarkand, Nurata, Shakhrisabz, Tashkent, Khorezm, Fergana) was comparatively analyzed and a systematic classification of more than 200 terms was created. The results showed that there is currently no uniformity in Uzbek embroidery terminology: the same object is named differently in different regions. This problem puts the need to standardize terminology on the agenda. The article provides concrete recommendations for including terms in a national dictionary and introducing them into international scientific circulation [3].
References
[1] Abdullayeva, N. (2015). O‘zbek hunarmandchiligi leksikasi. T.: Fan nashriyoti. 284 b.
[2] O‘zbekiston Fanlar Akademiyasi (2019). O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. T.: O‘zFAlar nashriyoti. 3 jild.
[3] Karimova, Z. (2020). O‘zbek milliy kashtachiligini o‘rganishda terminologik yondashuv. Til va adabiyot ta’limi, 4(2), 45–52.
[4] UNESCO (2019). Uzbek embroidery art, craftsmanship and performance traditions. Intangible Cultural Heritage List. Paris: UNESCO.
[5] Mirzayev, A. (2018). Mintaqaviy hunarmandchilik terminologiyasi: taqqoslama tahlil. O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti, 3, 67–74.
[6] Tojimatov, U. (2021). O‘zbek kashtachilik terminologiyasini standartlashtirish muammolari. Filologiya masalalari, 1, 112–119.
[7] Xoliqova, M. (2017). Hunarmandchilik leksikasining semantik tahlili. T.: Akademiya nashriyoti. 196 b.
[8] Stasov, V.V. (1887). Arabeski. Ornamentika Vostoka. Sankt-Peterburg: Imperatorskaya akademiya khudozhestv. 312 s.
[9] Semenov, A.A. (1923). Bukharskoye zolotoye shit'yo. Tashkent: Turkkustar. 88 s.
[10] Pugachenkova, G.A., Rempel, L.I. (1965). Vydayushchiyesya pamyatniki izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva Uzbekistana. Tashkent: Goslitizdat UzSSR. 432 s.
[11] Xasanova, R. (2001). Suzani naqshlarining semantikasi va terminologiyasi. T.: Fan. 168 b.
[12] Toshmatova, N. (2008). Nurota kashtachiligi: an’ana va terminologiya. Samarqand: SamDU nashriyoti. 124 b.
[13] Harvey, J. (1997). Traditional Textiles of Central Asia. London: Thames and Hudson. 256 p.
[14] Bilgrami, S., Iovino, C. (1990). Regional Costumes of India. New Delhi: Arnold Publishers. 344 p.
[15] Qodirov, P. (2016). O‘zbek tilidagi fors-tojik o‘zlashmalari. T.: Yangi asr avlodi. 312 b.
[16] Ergasheva, L. (2022). Kashtachilik terminologiyasida polisemiya. Tilshunoslik tadqiqotlari, 2(1), 88–96.
[18] Rajabov, I. (2019). Sovet davrida o‘zbek hunarmandchiligi terminologiyasidagi o‘zgarishlar. O‘zbekiston tarixi, 2, 34–41.
[19] UzHandicraft.uz (2023). O‘zbek milliy hunarmandchiligi portali. https://uzhandicraft.uz (murojaat: 12.11.2023).
[20] Reformatskiy, A.A. (1996). Terminologiya kak osobaya oblast' leksiki. Moskva: Nauka. 288 s.
[21] Leychik, V.M. (2007). Terminovedeniye: predmet, metody, struktura. Moskva: Komkniga. 256 s.
[22] Cabré, M.T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 248 p.
[23] ISO 704:2022. Terminology work — Principles and methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
[24] O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Davlat standartlashtirish komiteti (2020). Terminologiyani standartlashtirish bo‘yicha milliy qo‘llanma. T.: O‘zDSt.
