NEUTRALITY IN COMMUNICATION: PRAGMATIC, SEMANTIC, AND COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES
Keywords:
neutrality; ambiguity; vagueness; pragmatic implicature; context; discourse analysis; English and Uzbek linguisticsAbstract
This article examines neutrality as a communicative and pragmatic phenomenon in natural language discourse. Neutrality is analyzed in relation to ambiguity and vagueness, with particular attention to its functional role in meaning construction. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from pragmatics, semantics, and cognitive linguistics, the study investigates how neutrality operates at lexical, semantic, pragmatic, and cognitive levels of communication. The research is based on qualitative analysis of contextualized examples from English and Uzbek, illustrating both intentional and unintentional uses of neutral expressions.
Downloads
References
1. Grice H. P. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. 1975.
2. Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Les actes de langage dans le discours. Paris: Nathan. 2001.
3. Keller R. On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge. 1994.
4. Winter-Froemel E., Zirker A. Ambiguity and vagueness in language and literature: Theory and application. In E. Winter-Froemel & A. Zirker (Eds.), Enjeux du vague et de l’ambigu (pp. 1–25). Berlin: De Gruyter. 2018.
5. Traugott E. C., König E. The semantics–pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 1, pp. 189–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1991.
