PDF
ZENODO
Published
2025-05-23
Section
Articles
How to Cite
How to Cite
INTEGRATING CRITICAL THINKING INTO CEFR-BASED COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR 21ST-CENTURY COMPETENCE
A.X.Mukhamedov
Ass. Prof., PhD, JSPU
S.O.Doniyorova
Graduate Student, JSPU
Keywords: Critical Thinking, Communicative Competence, CEFR, Language Teaching, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Task-Based Learning, Reflection, Assessment, Curriculum Design, Digital Tools.
Abstract
This article explores the integration of critical thinking into CEFR-based communicative language teaching, arguing that such alignment is essential for preparing 21st-century learners to engage meaningfully in academic, professional, and intercultural contexts. Within the Uzbek educational landscape, where English is gaining prominence, the traditional focus on memorization and structural accuracy must give way to pedagogies that promote analysis, evaluation, and reflective communication. The study demonstrates how communicative descriptors can be reinterpreted through a critical thinking lens to foster autonomy and deeper engagement. It proposes a framework of spiraled, task-based activities that integrate language skills with higher-order thinking. The article also examines the use of digital platforms alongside low-tech tools to support collaborative reasoning, visible thinking, and formative assessment. Emphasis is placed on reflective practices, dual-trait rubrics, and portfolio-based evaluation as means to validate critical thinking-communicative competence development. Professional development, curriculum design, and national policy alignment are identified as key levers for sustainable implementation. Ultimately, the paper offers a research-informed model for transforming English language education in Uzbekistan and similar contexts, shifting the focus from rule-based instruction to inquiry-driven, cognitively rich learning.
References
1. Abdurahim-Salain, H. (2024). Analysis of portfolio for critical thinking and creativity development among education students. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(11).
2. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment - Companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
3. Dudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies: Research and resources in language teaching. Pearson Education.
4. Gao, Y., Qian, M., & Zhou, L. (2023). Investigating the effectiveness of problem-based learning on academic achievement in EFL classrooms: A meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(3), 345-360.
5. La Sunra. (2022). Exploring EFL students’ critical thinking through reflective journal. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 2(2), 227-238. HAR Press Indonesia.
6. Prasansaph, P. (2024). Project-based learning in EFL educational settings: A meta-analysis study in EFL/ESL writing. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 299-321.
7. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman Pearson Education.
