NEW PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Abdullayeva Xafiza Davronovna
Urgench branch of Tashkent medical academy, Urgench, Uzbekistan
Samandarova Nuriya Ergashovna
Urgench branch of Tashkent medical academy, Urgench, Uzbekistan
Bobojonova Durdona Bekbo‘lsin qizi
Urgench branch of Tashkent medical academy, Urgench, Uzbekistan
Keywords: organic chemistry education, problem-based learning, flipped classroom, molecular visualization, collaborative learning, educational technology
Abstract
This article explores innovative pedagogical approaches for teaching organic chemistry at the university level. Traditional teaching methods in organic chemistry often focus on rote memorization, which can lead to student disengagement and difficulties in applying concepts to new situations. This paper examines several modern teaching technologies and methodologies that promote deeper understanding, including problem-based learning, flipped classroom approaches, digital simulation tools, collaborative learning strategies, and visualization techniques. Implementation challenges and benefits are discussed, along with recommendations for integrating these approaches into existing curricula. Evidence from recent educational research suggests that these innovative pedagogical approaches can significantly enhance student comprehension, retention, and enthusiasm for organic chemistry.
References
1. Anderson, T. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2018). What can we do about 'Parker'? A case study of a good student who didn't 'get' organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 608-622.
2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2022). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day (2nd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
3. Bharath, S., Damayanthi, M., & Vengadasalam, R. (2022). Digital tools for visualizing organic reaction mechanisms: Impact on student learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(5), 1876-1884.
4. Bhattacharyya, G. (2022). Challenges in implementing evidence-based teaching in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2432-2441.
5. Cartrette, D. P., & Mayo, P. M. (2021). Collaborative problem solving in spectroscopy improves student outcomes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 142-158.
6. Conway, C. J. (2020). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning in organic chemistry: Student engagement and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(12), 4336-4346.
7. Cooke, J. P., Adams, N. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (2022). Two-stage collaborative exams for organic chemistry: Impact on student learning and attitudes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 398-410.
8. Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257.
9. Flynn, A. B. (2021). How effective is the flipped classroom approach in chemistry education? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 595-612.
10. Flynn, A. B., & Biggs, R. (2020). The development and implementation of a problem-based learning format in a sophomore organic chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), 1400-1407.
11. Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2019). Problem solving and learning in the laboratory: The role of reflection. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1150-1156.
12. Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2023). Developing alternative assessments for organic chemistry that align with learning goals. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(3), 1189-1201.
13. García-Martínez, J., Serrano-Torregrosa, E., & Atkins, P. (2023). Virtual reality applications for organic chemistry education: A comprehensive review. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 112-131.
14. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 221-228.
15. Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2021). Students' becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1), 121-142.
16. Kumar, R., & Refaei, B. (2022). Problem-based learning in undergraduate organic chemistry: Scaffolding students' learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(4), 1562-1571.
17. Lopez, S. A., Freeman, S., & Gabel, D. L. (2020). Undergraduate research projects as authentic assessment in organic chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2056-2064.
18. Mooring, S. R., Mitchell, C. E., & Burrows, N. L. (2020). Evaluation of a flipped, large-enrollment organic chemistry course on student attitude and achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1914-1923.
19. Popejoy, K., & Asala, K. (2023). Building learning communities through collaborative groups in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(6), 2143-2151.
20. Ramsey, S., Hooper, J., & Smith, M. (2021). Oral examinations in undergraduate organic chemistry: Effects on student performance and perceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 921-935.
21. Rowe, M. B. (2020). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control: Part one-wait-time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 469-485.
22. Seery, M. K., & Donnelly, R. (2023). Pre-lecture resources to reduce cognitive load in the organic chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(3), 709-722.
23. Stowe, R. L., & Cooper, M. M. (2019). Practicing what we preach: Assessing "critical thinking" in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1094-1101.
24. Stull, A. T., Gainer, M. J., & Hegarty, M. (2022). Learning by enacting: The role of embodiment in chemistry education. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101559.
25. Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2022). Peer-led team learning in organic chemistry: Effects on student performance and retention. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(9), 3156-3166.
26. Winter, J., Wentzel, M., & Ahluwalia, S. (2021). Development and evaluation of mobile applications for organic chemistry visualization and practice. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1639-1648.
27. Yuriev, E., Naidu, S., Schembri, L. S., & Short, J. L. (2021). Problem-based teaching in organic chemistry: Design, implementation and evaluation of an authentic learning experience. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 626-641.
28. Davronovna, A. H. (2025). MEDICINAL SUBSTANCES CONTAINING BIOMETALS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN MEDICINE. Next Scientists Conferences, 1 (01), 87–89.
29. Davronovna, A. X., Razzaqberganovna, K. O., & Farxodovna, T. A. (2025). TIBBIY KIMYO FANINI O ‘QITISHDA INNOVATSION PEDAGOGIK TEXNOLOGIYALAR. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 5(5), 100-108.
30. Razzakberganovna, K. O. (2025). SYNTHESIS OF QUINOLINE ALKALOIDS USING AMIDES. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 722-726.
31. Ibrakhimova, H. R., Sadullaev, S. E., & Nurllayev, R. R. (2023). SPREAD OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AMONG THE POPULATION OF THE KHOREZM REGION. IMRAS, 6(7), 328-332.
32. Tuychiev, L. N., Khudaykulova, G. K., Eraliev, U. E., Djuraeva, N. K., & Sadullaev, S. E. (2023). A STUDY OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COVID-19 REHABILITATION.
33. Sadullayev, S. E., Abdullayeva, D. K., Ibragimov, S. J., & Yoqubov, Q. Y. (2024). ANALYSIS OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF DIARRHEAL DISEASES IN CHILDREN IN THE SOUTHERN ARAL REGION. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 4(2), 345-351.
34. Artikov, I. A., Sadullaev, S. E., Ibrakhimova, H. R., & Abdullayeva, D. K. (2023). RELEVANCE OF VIRAL HEPATITIS EPIDEMIOLOGY. IMRAS, 6 (7), 316–322.














