Pragmatic Features of Somatic Expressions in English and Uzbek Languages

Firuza Narzullayeva

Associate professor of the Department of English literature and translation of Bukhara State University

Mohinur Xikmatova

The 1st grade master student of History and Philology Department of Asia International University

Keywords: somatic expressions, pragmatic functions, collectivism


Abstract

This study explores the pragmatic features of somatic expressions in English and Uzbek, focusing on how non-verbal communication, particularly body-related expressions (somatic expressions), functions within the cultural and linguistic contexts of both languages. Somatic expressions, including gestures, facial expressions, and metaphorical uses of body parts, are integral to communication and often carry distinct pragmatic meanings depending on the social and cultural settings. The research compares the pragmatic roles of somatic expressions in English and Uzbek, highlighting the similarities and differences in their usage in everyday conversations, formal interactions, and cultural rituals.


References

1. Abdurahmanova S. Processing of English idioms with body part components by native speakers of Turkish learning English with intermediate level of proficiency. Thesis for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree. Istanbul, 2012, P.142

2. Albert Mehrabian, Nonverbal Communication 1972. New York. Routledge P:2-15

3. David Matsumoto, Culture and Emotion 2012. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43(1):91-118

Kendon, A. (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 400pp.

4. Judee Kathelene Burgoon, Joseph A. Bonito, Artemio Ramirez, Norah Dunbar. Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction, 2002, Journal of Communication 52(3):657-677

5. Kasimov A. Nonverbal means in English and Uzbek languages. Research Journal of Analysis and Inventions. Volume 2, April, 2021. –P.184.

6. Mehmonova Yulduz. "Syntactic and semantic analysis of word combinations in the English and Uzbek languages." ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz) 14.14 (2022).

7. Narzullayeva, Firuza. "BOSH SO’ZI SOMATIZMLARINING INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA QO’LLANISHI." Центр научных публикаций (buxdu. uz) 8.8 (2021).

8. Narzullayeva Firuza. (2020). English Phraseological Units with Somatic Components. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 1(1), 29-31.

9. Paul Ekman. Cognition and Emotion,1992 6(3/4) 169-200

10. Xodjayeva Dilafruz Izzatullayevna, & Marjona Makhmudovna. (2023). INGLIZ TILIDA KIRISH SO`ZLARINING PRAGMATIK TAHLILI. Integration Conference on Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes, 130–133. Retrieved from https://conferenceseries.info/index.php/online/article/view/1009

11. Khayriddinovna, Ganieva Orzigul. "ANTHROPOCENTRIC APPROACH IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN AND UZBEK NOVEL WRITING." International Journal Of Literature And Languages 4.12 (2024): 55-59.

12. Raupovich, Ziyodullayev Akmal. "Mulkiy (proprietar) eponimlarning o’ziga xos tabiati." Integration Conference on Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes. 2022.

13. Khaydarova, L. . (2023). Teaching Listening Comprehension as a Part of Educational Process at School. Web of Semantic: Universal Journal on Innovative Education, 2(3), 259–263. Retrieved from https://univerpubl.com/index.php/semantic/article/view/778

14. Mehmonova, Yulduz. "Syntactic and semantic analysis of word combinations in the English and Uzbek languages." ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz) 14.14 (2022).