PDF
ZENODO
CERTIFICATE
Published
2023-10-31
Section
Articles
How to Cite
How to Cite
SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE
Kholikov Farkhad Uktamovich
Senior Lecturer of Department Criminal Law, Criminology and fight against corruption of Tashkent State University of Law
Keywords: administrative prejudice, repeatability, non bis in idem, danger of personality, crime, administrative offence.
Abstract
The legislative consolidation of the institution of administrative prejudice is inconsistent. This creates difficulties in defining its boundaries in the understanding and application of the relevant rules. Itself administrative collateral estoppel deserves a critical eye. It violates the principle of non bis in idem; shifts the basis of criminal responsibility towards the personality of the offender; blurs the boundaries between crime and administrative offence. Its existence is actually allocated among administrative offences special group of torts, which occupies its public danger an intermediate position between administrative great-wonarishinani and crimes. This result unnecessarily complicates the system of public offences.
References
Bezverkhov A.G. The return of administrative prejudice to the criminal legislation of Russia // Russian justice. – 2012. – No. 1. – p. 52.
Chikin D.S. Crime with administrative prejudice as a type of complex single crime // A Russian investigator. - 2012. – No. 23. – p. 17.
Lopashenko N.A. Administrative prejudice in criminal law – no! // Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. - 2011. – No. 3. – p. 68.
Yamasheva G.V. On the issue of restoring the institution of administrative prejudice in criminal law // Journal of Russian Law. - 2009. – No. 10. – p. 71.
Ivanchin A.V. Conceptual foundations of the construction of the corpus delicti: Abstract. diss. ... doct. jurid. Sciences. – p. 14.
Rustambaev M.H. Course of Criminal Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. General part. Volume 1: the doctrine of crime. Textbook for OTM. - T.: "Tdyui" publishing house, 2010. - P. 386.
Kabulov R., Atajanov A. A. and arch. Criminal law. General part. - T.: Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2012.-B.373.
Usmanaliev M. Criminal law. General part. Textbook for higher education institutions.- T., "Generation of the new century", - B.16.
Kholikov F. PROBLEMS OF DECRIMINALIZATION OF CRIMINAL NORMS WITH ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE IN CRIMINAL-LEGAL POLICY - 2023. - T. 3. – no. 3. - S. 192-199. (Холиков Ф. ЖИНОЯТ-ҲУҚУҚИЙ СИЁСАТДА МАЪМУРИЙ ПРЕЮДИЦИЯГА ЭГА БЎЛГАН ЖИНОЯТ НОРМАЛАРИНИ ДЕКРИМИНАЛИЗАЦИЯ ҚИЛИШ МАСАЛАЛАРИ //Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук. – 2023. – Т. 3. – №. 3. – С. 192-199.)
